

|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I think I'll stick to the topic of football because the rest of these arguments are bullshit.
I have nothing but respect for Tech's football team. They are fun to watch, they don't give up, and they can be pretty damn good when you give them an inch or two. The fans make Lubbock a tough place to play, but that's the only good thing I can think of to say about them. I realize there are a few good ones up there, but "few" is the operative word.
Kingsbury and Welker killed our defense, which was already suffering, due to injuries, but we could have beaten them without our missing players. We just didn't. Our gameday coaching sucked, our defense was miserable, our offense and special teams could have been much better (though Simms did a hell of a job), and we had too damn many penalties. Combine all that with the fact that Tech was giving a fantastic performance, and it's no freaking wonder we lost.
Congrats to all the Tech fans on this board. The Red Raiders earned this one.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
If your analysis of "winners" and "losers" is centered solely on the 2002 football season, then yes...I suppose LCC is the "winner".
But if you prefer to focus on things like academics, reputation, quality of life, and the ratio of positive to negative news stories about your school, I would say that A&M and UT are the clear winners year in and year out.
After all, even if you Red Retards go 11-0, you still live in Lubfuck, you still go to Tech, and you're still dropping $30K on an education you could have picked up for 1/5th the cost at Tarrant Community College.
P.S. You may have beat A&M and UT, but what bowl game are you going to? You're not even in the fucking BCS.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Has The Big 12 done more recruiting in the QB position? Because with the loss of names such as Chris Simms, Nate Hybl, Mark Ferris (decent), and Kliff Kingsbury there are a number of power houses that will be hurting. A&M will be okay if Reggie gets better. Tech will suck again. Texas will be all hype around some "big" name and then prove there all hype later in the season. And OU I'm unsure about since Nate Hybl will be gone, and Jason White is still recovering from his surgery. So it's all up in the air.
And to answer Raider Pride, this board talked about why Tech isn't competition. Basically they don't have the history, the competitive record, or the clout to be considered real competition. The only reason they are considered any minor form of competition is because they are on everyone's schedule as another opponent. But OU will show Tech why they aren't considered competition (hope I don't eat those words later). The game is in Norman, and minus the OSU loss at home last season, OU hasn't lost a home game since 1999. So get your guns up or whatever the fuck you guys do, make the long drive to Norman from Lubfuck, try not to vandalize any of the campus, and leave with tail between legs with a real showing of what Tech is about.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |

Click here to register a name on the board. When a name is registered, a password is required to post with that name
Forgot your password? Click here to e-mail yourself the password again.
|
 |
|