Comments

Message Board
Post Something
Get the hell outta here
Decipher Names

















Message Board - Post Something - Get the hell outta here - Decipher Names

Monday Dec 10th 1:44am
John Pace  - Lubbock Community College

I'm fucked up...so disregard anything I've ever said! HAHAHA! Pills are good....pills are GOOOODDDD!

Sunday Dec 9th 11:12pm
matt  - Texas A&M

Agreed... I think Terry Bowden said it best after his Auburn Tigers went undefeated the year they were on probation and bowl ineligible. "The beauty of college football is that it's never over... You can bicker about who should have gotten this and should have gotten that all year round."

Sunday Dec 9th 10:53pm
Typing Monkey ®  - Texas A&M

The beauty of the BCS is that if you have a good strength of schedule and win all your games, you will go to the national championship game. If you don't, then you might not go. This makes each and every regular season game very important, and that is the way it should be.

Sunday Dec 9th 9:18pm
05'er  - Texas A&M

bra-fuckin-vo matt...finally someone else gets it. i've been telling people the same shit for a week now, and they keep claiming that nebraska "cheated". of course they can't show me a rule the huskers broke, so then they go to the "we beat them" card, but when i point out the fact that head-to-head matchups don't mean shit to the computers they move on to something else. funny thing is i can't be too hard on these tools since they are just regurgitating what the whiney-ass media has been spitting for weeks now. no, the bcs didn't work out the way it's sposed to this year; but then again, as long as there aren't two undefeated teams with strong strengths of schedule at the end of every season, it never will. how come these "expert" armchair analysts can't get it, but a couple of aggies that spend half their days in a drunken stupor can? weeeeeird. go big red

Sunday Dec 9th 8:51pm
Jimmy  - Texas A&M

If I had it to do all over again, I'd just get myself drunk and jump right back in.

Sunday Dec 9th 8:16pm
Corey Haas  - Lubbock Community College

I heard that Brad and John were posting stuff on here so I was tempted. I go to Tech, or LCC as you people so cleaverly like to put it. I like it too. The shit smell isn't so bad, and the roads aren't too bad either. We don't have drag rats, and we don't have aggies, so thats a bonus. No matter where you go to school the beer flows like wine, er...beer, so drop that whole thing. I can't speak for every one out here, but my SAT score would have gotten me into basically any school I wanted, including UT or A&M. Just one more thing, ALAMO BOWL...WHAT!

Sunday Dec 9th 7:20pm
Grace  - Somewhere not in Texas or not important

I would like to confirm the joke concerning a degree in English. I, as an English major at TCU, have never gone against my anti-reading policy and, therefore, buy the books simply to bring them to class and highlight the excerpts the profs. point out to us. This is the greatest major ever and I have files of my fantastically creative papers for anybody who needs them.

While I'm writing, I would also like to point out that Powerball IS the greatest indoor sport there is to help waste time during dead days and finals. By the way, our exit sign has not been fixed yet.

TCU football may not be the best, but we will certainly kick some Aggie ass.

Sunday Dec 9th 7:05pm
matt  - Texas A&M

While the BCS system has its flaws, this year it hasn't been flawed. I really don't see what the big fuss is about. So Nebraska didn't win their conference -- since when has conference standings had any impact on the national title? Say Team A from the Big 12 goes 7-0 in conference, but 0-4 outside of conference; Team B from the Big 12 goes 6-1 in conference, and 4-0 outside of conference -- is Team A somehow more deserving at 7-4 to go for the national title than Team B? I didn't think so. Colorado had 2 losses, Nebraska had 1. They both had similar strength of schedules. So Colorado beat Nebraska... Had they both ended the season with similar records, that might have had an impact, but alas, Colorado lost to Fresno State and Texas. I'm not being biased here, I've been a Buffalo fan all my life, but they don't deserve to be in the Rose Bowl.

As for Oregon's supposed "snubbing", look at their strength of schedule. They also play in the most overated conference of them all, the Pac 10. Sorry guys... Good season, but you don't deserve to be playing for the national title.

I really don't see the problem this year. Miami wins, they are national champs. Nebraska wins, they are national champs (though some say they will be co-champs with the winner of Oregon/CU, but sorry guys, that aint gonna happen).

As for the playoff system someone proposed, that still doesn't get rid of the problem of rankings -- all it does is make the team that gets screwed over less noticeable to the nation, but more unfair. Instead of there being a debate over who should be #2 in the nation and get the right to play for the title, there will be a debate over who deserves to be #16 in the nation and get into the playoffs. And believe me guys, if you think it is a tough call deciding who is most deserving to be #2, #3, and #4 in the nation, try sorting out all the similar records and strength of schedules you have at #14, #15, #16, #17, and #18 in the nation.

The beauty of college football is that anything can happen, and everything effects everything. Who would have thought that Colorado's chances of getting to play for the national title hinged on the field goal kicker for Southern Mississippi in a seemingly meaningless game against TCU as far as the national title went. Turns out it wasn't so meaningless - it decided who #2 in the nation was.

Sunday Dec 9th 5:51pm
ChanceMock  - UT Austin

For OUguy: UT's cupcake schedule was rated 33rd toughest in the nation as per the final BCS rankings of today. While nobody is arguing that we played against the toughest competition in the nation, 33rd is 3 positions higher than a certain school north of the Red River *cough* OU *cough*.

Take it as as more evidence of the BCS's failure if you want, but facts are facts. Anyway, I totally agree that a playoff system is the best solution to crowning a national champion.

Sunday Dec 9th 5:27pm
Jolie ®  - Texas A&M

Food, Beer, and more Management yuck, then Accounting, and Come Tuesday I am a Party Animal!!!

Sunday Dec 9th 4:33pm
Typing Monkey ®  - Texas A&M

The only people with power to change the Decipher Names page are Webmaster(Matt) and Typing Monkey(me).

Sunday Dec 9th 4:29pm
Kelly ®  - UT Austin

Haven't we already run through this argument five or six times now?

Sunday Dec 9th 4:17pm
OU_Architecture_Guy ®  - Somewhere not in Texas or not important

Brad Arthur and John Pace,
If your so worried about people posting under your name register it. That's what it's here for. Or have Wheatables or whoever add your names to the Decipher Names link. That way we know who you are and you can see who we are.

On another note. The BCS is one huge cluster fuck right now. I don't believe the Huskers have earned the right to goto the Rose Bowl since they didn't even win the conference. Nobody has offered up a solution to fix the problem in the scoring or ratings, and the only alternative (which I am all for) is a Playoff System. 16 games at the end of the season. Not only will that cause the teams to be more competitive, but will also make the games throughout the season more interesting. Teams will no longer be looking for the cupcake schedule *cough* UT *cough* This season *cough*. They will be looking to play bigger and better teams so they can grab one of the spots in the playoffs.

Sunday Dec 9th 3:57pm
Typing Monkey ®  - Texas A&M

Yes, drinking is good. Everyone on here just needs to have one bourbon, one scotch, and one beer to cool down.

Sunday Dec 9th 2:51pm
headradio ®  - Texas A&M

drinking is cool...i like drinking.

Sunday Dec 9th 2:25pm
Kelly ®  - UT Austin

Let's just talk drinking... it tends to be much more interesting and less debateable than what school has the hottest girls and the lowest admissions standards, to say nothing of Martin this and Martin that.

Sunday Dec 9th 1:52pm
Mighty Kumquat ®  - Texas A&M

It's a ring toss game.

Sunday Dec 9th 1:49pm
Bluto ®  - UT Austin

Well, I don't know...y'all insulted Betik by name earlier and wondered if anyone thought he was cool. So don't start acting like you guys are the only ones being attacked.

P.S. Anytime someone has to brag about how "fucking hot" their girlfriend is (as if that somehow makes you a better person than the rest of us on this message board)...it's pretty pathetic.

Sunday Dec 9th 12:20pm
Brad Arthur  - Lubbock Community College

Yeah, Im with Pace, who is this Petus guy? The rest of you explained yourselves and I really appreciate it. But this guy acts like he is so cool and hard and I don't even know who he is, because I won't forgive that fag.

Sunday Dec 9th 12:08pm
John Pace  - Lubbock Community College

Just wondering...who is Petus then? he apparently knows me, so when he talks shit, i'd just like to know his real name...

Sunday Dec 9th 11:54am
Brad Arthur  - Lubbock Community College

It started out us just joking, I wasn't pissed at all when I read what yall had written about Tech. I only got mad when people started saying shit about me.

Sunday Dec 9th 11:40am
Typing Monkey ®  - Texas A&M

Brad,
Some people do hide behind names when they post stuff, but the majority of the people here always post under the same name. Also, we have the "Decipher Names" link on this page so you can see the name, IM screen name, and picture that corresponds to a registered handle. As far as the comments go, I wouldn't take them too seriously. I am sure a lot of LCC students would be offended if they took everything on this site seriously. In the same respect, I could be offended if I actually read RaiderPower.com and took everything on their site seriously. Remember that none of these comments, unless they are preceded with your name, are not directed at you. Just ignore them and enjoy other aspects of the site.

Brian

Sunday Dec 9th 11:28am
Cody ®  - Trinity University

Opinions are like assholes; everybody has one, and everybody thinks that everyone else's stinks. That being said, I think you need to seriously reevaluate your life if you take a bunch of comments on a website messageboard that seriously.

Sunday Dec 9th 11:12am
Webmaster ®  - UT Austin

Brad:

I post under this name (Webmaster) only. As you can see, I don't talk too much shit. Especially lately (with huge projects due and all). Don't have the time or really care to waste my time talking shit about people 500 miles away.

Sure I like to talk shit about Tech in general (the cow shit smell, the flooding roads), but that's just every once in a while and is never meant to be a personal insult to anyone. I think it's the anonymousness of the internet that encourages people to talk so much shit. I think you shouldn't take anything written on the internet personally. I know it's easy to take it personally b/c I get pissed sometimes as well. Just remember that most of the people are drunk and have nothing better to do at the time.

(I deleted your fraudulent posts)

  -Matt




Click here to register a name on the board. When a name is registered, a password is required to post with that name

Forgot your password? Click here to e-mail yourself the password again.