

|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Forgive me if I inject a little football into the soroity-bashing and political talk going on here ...
UT@BU - Well, Baylor's offense DID score 11 more points against OU than we did. However, I don't believe that Baylor really stands a chance. I mean, unless Matt Nordgren starts, in which case, it's even money.
OUv.TU - Tulsa. Oklahoma scheduled fucking TULSA as a late-season OOC game? No bitching. If OU doesn't win by 50, OU_ARCH_GUY has to publicly proclaim that Bob Stoops is the antichrist.
A&M@TTU - Now we get to the real meat and potatoes of the week in college football. This is going to be real interesting. As with NUv.OU last week, my heart and my mind are telling me two different things. My mind says - A&M has trailed in the second half to McNeese St, Wyoming and BAylor, among others. How can they hang with a not-totally-shitty Tech team? My mind is saying - the game is in lubbock, asshole, where A&M hasn't won since the Regean administration. But my heart says, fuck'it. I think A&M is just living right this year - yeah, they've played pretty poorly at times, but they just seem to keep on winning. And I think that continues this week, even in lubbock - A&M by 7. If the line is more than that, take the points. If Tech is favored, don't throw away your money.
And take the over on the Purdue game. I don't care who they're playing. If you saw the Northwestern game last week, you'll know that I'm talking about.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |

Click here to register a name on the board. When a name is registered, a password is required to post with that name
Forgot your password? Click here to e-mail yourself the password again.
|
 |
|